2006 film of 2003 Lauren Weisberger novel
The Devil Wears Prada is a 2006 American based on 's . This stars as Miranda Priestly, a powerful , and as Andrea (Andy) Sachs, a college graduate who goes to New York City and lands a job as Priestly's co-assistant. and co-star as co-assistant Emily Charlton and art director Nigel, respectively.
, , and play key supporting roles. produced and the film, which was distributed by . Streep's performance drew critical acclaim and earned her many award nominations, including her record-setting 14th bid, as well as the for . Blunt also drew favorable reviews and nominations for her performance, as did many of those involved in the film's production.
The film was well received by both film critics and the public and became a surprise summer box-office hit following its June 30 North American release. The commercial success and critical praise for Streep's performance continued in foreign markets with the film leading the international box office for most of October. Likewise, the U.S. DVD release was the top rental during December. The film finished in 2006's Top 20 both in the U.S. and overseas and grossed over 0 million, mostly from its international run.
Although the movie is set in the fashion world, most and other fashion notables avoided appearing as themselves for fear of displeasing U.S. editor , who is widely believed to have been the inspiration for Priestly. Still, many allowed their clothes and to be used in the film, making it one of the most expensively costumed films in history. Wintour later overcame her initial skepticism, saying she liked the film and Streep in particular.
Andy is an aspiring fresh out of . Despite her ridicule for the shallowness of the fashion industry, she lands a job as junior to , the editor-in-chief of Runway magazine. Andy plans to put up with Miranda's excessive demands and humiliating treatment for one year in the hopes of getting a job as a reporter or writer somewhere else.
At first, Andy fumbles with her job and fits in poorly with her gossipy, fashion-conscious co-workers, especially Miranda's senior assistant, Emily Charlton. However, she does find an ally in art director Nigel, and gradually learns her responsibilities and begins to dress more stylishly to show her effort and commitment to the position. She also meets an attractive young writer, Christian Thompson, who offers to help her with her career. As she spends increasing amounts of time at Miranda's beck and call, problems arise in her relationships with her college friends and her live-in boyfriend, Nate, a working his way up the career ladder.
Miranda is impressed by Andy and allows her to be the one to bring the treasured "Book", a mock-up of the upcoming edition, to her home, along with her dry cleaning. She is given instructions by Emily about where to leave the items and is told not to speak with anyone in the home. Andy arrives at Miranda's home only to discover that the instructions she received are vague. As she tries to figure out what to do, Andy begins to panic. Miranda's twins, Caroline and Cassidy, falsely tell her she can leave the book at the top of the stairs just as Emily has done on many occasions. At the top of the stairs, Andy interrupts Miranda and her husband having an argument. Mortified, Andy leaves the book and runs out of the home.
The next day, Miranda tells Andy that she wants the new unpublished book for her daughters and, if Andy cannot find a copy, she will be fired. Andy desperately attempts to find the book and nearly gives up, but ultimately obtains it through Christian's contacts. She surprises Miranda by not only finding the book but having copies sent to the girls at the train station, leaving no doubt that she accomplished Miranda's "impossible" task, thus saving her job. Andy gradually begins to outperform Emily at her job, and slowly but surely becomes more glamorous and begins aligning herself, unwittingly at first, to the Runway philosophy.
One day, Andy saves Miranda from being embarrassed at a charity benefit, and Miranda rewards her by offering to take her to the fall fashion shows in instead of Emily. Andy hesitates to take this privilege away from Emily but is forced to accept the offer after being told by Miranda that she will lose her job if she declines. Andy tries to tell Emily on her way to work, but Emily gets hit by a car. Andy later breaks the news to a hospitalized Emily.
When Andy tells Nate she is going to Paris, he is angered by her refusal to admit that she's become what she once ridiculed, and they break up. Once there, Miranda, without makeup, opens up to Andy about the effect Miranda's impending divorce will have on her daughters. Later that night, Nigel tells Andy that he has accepted a job as Creative Director with rising fashion star James Holt at Miranda's recommendation. Andy finally succumbs to Christian's charms and, after spending the night with him, learns from him about a plan to replace Miranda with Jacqueline Follet as editor of Runway. Despite the suffering she has endured at her boss's behest, she attempts to warn Miranda.
At a luncheon later that day, however, Miranda announces that it is Jacqueline instead of Nigel who will leave Runway for Holt. Nigel remarks to a stunned Andy that, though disappointed, he has to believe that his loyalty to Miranda will one day pay off. Later, when Miranda and Andy are being driven to a show, she explains to a still-stunned Andy that she was grateful for the warning but already knew of the plot to replace her and sacrificed Nigel to keep her own job. Pleased by this display of loyalty, she tells Andy that she sees a great deal of herself in her. Andy, repulsed, says she could never do that to anyone. Miranda replies that she already did, stepping over Emily when she agreed to go to Paris. When they stop, Andy gets out and throws her cell phone into the fountain of the , leaving Miranda, Runway, and fashion behind.
Some time later, Andy meets up with Nate, who is moving to Boston because he got a new job as the sous chef of a restaurant. They agree to start dating again and see what the future holds. The same day, Andy is interviewed and is accepted to work at a major New York publication company. The editor recounts how he called Runway for a reference on Andy, and got a response from Miranda herself. Miranda described Andy as "her biggest disappointment"- and said that the editor would be "an idiot" if he didn't hire her. Emily is offered her Paris wardrobe by Andy and the two leave on good terms. Andy passes the "Runway" office building and sees Miranda get into a car. Andy gives a wave, but Miranda does not acknowledge her. Andy is used to this and instead walks further into the crowd. Once inside the car, however, Miranda smiles and then orders her chauffeur to drive.
When we made it I was naive. I know now how rare it is to find situations where the stars align.
Director and producer had originally read The Devil Wears Prada in book proposal form. It would be Frankel's second theatrical feature, and his first in over a decade. He, and costume designer , drew heavily on their experience in making .
Frankel recalls the whole experience as having high stakes for those involved, since for himself and the others behind the camera it was the biggest project they had yet attempted, with barely adequate resources. "We knew we were on very thin ice," he told for a 2016 article on the film's 10th anniversary. "It was possible this could be the end of the road for us."
Fox bought the rights to Weisberger's novel before it was not only published in 2003, but even finished. Carla Hecken, then the studio's executive vice president, had only seen the first hundred pages of manuscript and an outline for how the rest of the plot was to go. But for her that was enough. "I thought Miranda Priestly was one of the greatest villains ever," she recalled in 2016. "I remember we aggressively went in and scooped it up."
Work on a screenplay started promptly, before Weisberger had even finished her work. When it became a bestseller upon publication, elements of the plot were incorporated into the screenplay in progress. Most took their inspiration from the 2001 film and primarily satirized the fashion industry. But it was still not ready to film. Elizabeth Gabler, later head of production at Fox, noted that the finished novel did not have a strong narrative. "Since there wasn't a strong third act in the book," she said later, "we needed to invent that."
In the meantime, the studio and producer sought a director. Out of many candidates with experience in comedy, was hired despite his limited experience, having only made one feature, , along with some episodes of and . He was unsure about the property, calling it "undirectable ... a satire rather than a love story." Later, he cited , the 1995 documentary about designer , as his model for the film's attitude towards fashion: "[It] revels in some of the silliness of the fashion world, but is also very serious."
At a meeting with Finerman, Frankel told her that he thought the story unnecessarily punished Miranda. "My view was that we should be grateful for excellence. Why do the excellent people have to be nice?" He prepared to move on and consider more scripts. Two days later his manager persuaded him to reconsider and look for something he liked that he could shape the film into. He took the job, giving Finerman extensive notes on the script and laying out a detailed vision for the film.
Four worked on the property. wrote the first draft, but didn't think he could do more; another writer passed. did some work on Miranda's scenes, followed by a rewrite. After that, , who was able to relate her own youthful experiences attempting to launch a journalism career in New York to the story, produced a draft after a month's work that struck the right balance for Finerman and Frankel, whose notes were incorporated into a final version, rearranging the plot significantly, following the book less closely and focusing the story on the conflict between Andrea and Miranda. She found the experience of writing a story with female protagonists that did not center around a relationship "very liberating ... I felt I was allowed to do what the movie wanted to be, a Faust story, a for ladies."
McKenna also initially toned down Miranda's meanness at the request of Finerman and Frankel, only to restore it later for Streep. She later cited as her main influence for the insults in the dialogue; before even starting work on the screenplay she had come up with Miranda's "Take a chance. Hire the smart fat girl" line, which she felt summed up the disparity between Andy and the world she found herself in.
McKenna consulted with acquaintances who worked in fashion to make her screenplay more realistic. In a 2010 lecture, she told of a scene that was changed after one of these reviews, where Nigel told Andy not to complain so much about her job. Originally, she had made his speech more of a supportive ; however one of those acquaintances said that would not happen: "[N]o-one in that world is nice to each other ... There's no reason to be, and they don't have time." she quoted him as saying.
Cerulean sweater speech
The " speech", where Miranda draws the connection between the designer fashion in Runway's pages and Andy's sweater, criticizing Andy's snobbishness about fashion and explaining the , had its origins in a scene cut from earlier drafts that Streep had asked to have restored. It slowly grew from a few lines where the editor disparaged her assistant's fashion sense to a speech about "why she thought fashion was important ... She is so aware that she is affecting billions of people, and what they pick off the floor and what they are putting on their bodies in the morning."Streep said in 2016 she was interested in "the responsibility lying on the shoulders of a woman who was the head of a global brand ... That scene wasn't about the fun of fashion, it was about marketing and business."
McKenna recalls that she kept expanding it to suit Streep and Frankel, but even a few days before it was scheduled to be filmed she was unsure if it would be used or even shot. She was revising it at a nearby when she realized that Miranda would describe something not as just blue—chosen as the color for Andy's sweater since it would work best on screen—but would instead use an exact shade. From a list of shades McKenna sent, Streep picked cerulean; the final speech takes up almost a page of the script, long for a mainstream film. "I was like, it'd be cool if half of that ended up in the movie," the writer says. "Every word is in the movie." The references to past designer collections are entirely fictional, McKenna explains, since the speech was written around the sweater's color (however, the later pointed out, designers often take their fashion inspiration from the streets).
The speech has become one of the film's most memorable moments; "Miranda's signature monologue" to . "'Cerulean' [has never] sounded more sinister," the Huffington Post wrote in 2016,, former editor of British , said it was "a rare glimpse at the way in which even the most outlandish and extreme exponents of fashion ... influence and enrich all our lives, even if we only ever shop at or ."
Once the script was finished, the filmmakers and Fox focused on getting to play Miranda; Hacken recalled she was seen as so perfect for the part that no one had discussed any alternatives (although McKenna recalls writing provisional dialogue should the producers have had to settle for another actress). Weisberger, who initially could not imagine Streep playing the part, recalled that after seeing her on set it was "crystal clear" that she was perfect for the role.
The news that Streep would meet with Frankel was celebrated at Fox. But while Streep, for her part, knew the movie could be very successful, she felt the pay she was being offered for playing Miranda was "slightly, if not insulting, not perhaps reflective of my actual value to the project." The producers doubled it to around million, and she signed on, allowing Fox to the film. According to Frankel, Streep saw the film as a chance to "skewer the doyennes of the fashion world." She has three daughters, and as an ardent , felt that fashion magazines "twisted the minds of young women around the world and their priorities. This was an interesting way to get back at them." Also, she said, the film passed the .
She insisted on the scenes where she explains to Andy the connection between the blue sweater she is wearing and the industry, and the scene where Miranda briefly opens up to Andy, without makeup, about her divorce. "I wanted", she explained, "to see that face without its protective glaze, to glimpse the woman in the businesswoman."
Casting Andy was less clear-cut. Fox wanted an younger actress, and felt , then coming off successes in and , would help the film's commercial prospects. However, she declined several offers to play Andy, telling the studio she was trying to avoid mainstream projects for a while.
Hathaway, by contrast, actively sought the part, tracing "Hire me" in the sand of the on Hacken's desk when she talked about the project with the executive. While Frankel liked her enough to not require her to , she knew she was not the studio's first choice and had to be patient (other accounts say that she was the only actress considered for the lead). Fox production chief Elizabeth Gabler says the studio did not realize how strong her audience was after the movies. She took the part to work with Streep, but also due to some personal aspects. She celebrated when she learned she had gotten the part.
Over a hundred actresses had been considered for Emily before one of the casting agents taped reading some of the lines elsewhere on the Fox lot as she was leaving for her flight to London following her audition for . Although she read them in her native despite the character being written as American as she is in the novel, Frankel was interested; Finerman liked her for her sense of humor. After the makers of Eragon cast , Frankel called her in the bathroom of "some dive club" in London, where she was consoling herself with her sister. He told her that while he would have cast her just from the tape, the studio wanted to see another audition with her dressed more in character. She insisted on continuing to play the character as British; Both Hathaway and Emily Blunt lost weight for their roles, with Hathaway later recounting that "[she] and I would clutch at each other and cry because we were so hungry." Blunt later denied rumors she did this at the filmmakers' request.
Colleen and Suzanne Dengel, the twins who played Miranda's daughters, were cast two weeks after auditioning for Frankel and Finerman. The director and producer laughed, which the sisters believed help them get the part. They recalled in 2017 that they were excited both by being able to work together on camera for the first time, as well as the chance to act opposite Hathaway since they were big fans of the Princess Diaries movies as well.
Tucci was one of the last actors cast; he agreed to play Nigel only three days before shooting started. The filmmakers reportedly had auditioned creative director and 's , both openly gay men highly visible as media fashion commentators, for the part; the 's also auditioned. Verdi would later say there was no intention to actually hire him and the producers had just used him and Doonan to give whoever they ultimately did cast some filmed research to use in playing a gay character (he would end up with a walk-on part as a fashion journalist in Paris). Tucci says he was unaware of this: "All I know is that someone called me and I realized this was a great part." He based the character on various people he was acquainted with, insisting on the glasses he ultimately wore. had originally read for Tucci's part, rather unenthusiastically since he had just finished playing a similar character, but then read the Holt part and asked if he could audition for it. auditioned by sending a video of himself, wearing the same self-designed green jacket he has on when he and Andrea meet for the first time.
Weisberger is widely believed to have based Miranda on , the powerful editor of . Wintour reportedly warned major who had been invited to make as themselves in the film that they would be banished from the 's pages if they did so.Vogue and other major and magazines have avoided reviewing or even mentioning the book in their pages. Wintour's spokespeople deny the claim, but costume designer says many designers told her they did not want to risk Wintour's wrath.
Only , who had designed the black Streep wears in the museum benefit scene, chose to make an appearance. Coincidentally, he was in New York during production and Finerman dared Field, an acquaintance, to ask him personally. Much to her surprise, he accepted. Other cameos of note include as herself and Weisberger as the twins' .Streep's daughter's film debut as a at was cut. agreed to be in the movie only if she did not play a model.
took place over 57 days in New York and Paris between October and December 2005. The film's budget was million. It was originally lower, which caused problems with some locations—the crew could not get permission to shoot at the or .
Ballhaus, at Finerman and Frankel's suggestion, composed as many shots as possible, whether interiors or exteriors, to at least partially take in busy New York street scenes in the background, to convey the excitement of working in a glamorous industry in New York. He also used a handheld during some of the busier meeting scenes in Miranda's office, to better convey the flow of action, and slow motion for Andrea's entrance into the office following her makeover. A few were necessary, mainly to put exterior views behind windows on sets and in the Mercedes where Miranda and Andrea are having their climactic conversation.
Fox originally refused permission to let Frankel shoot some scenes from the third act in , where it is set, due to the low budget. But after six "nightmarish" weeks of shooting, he had an editor cut a "" of highlights. That convinced the studio to increase the budget to allow for limited shooting overseas (Streep did not go as Fox believed it would be too expensive).
Several weeks after all the major parts had been cast, the actors gathered in New York for a . Hathaway was nervous and goofy, she recalls, since she still had not developed her idea of the part; she described her performance at that point as "[nothing] particularly impressive." Blunt, by contrast, found Streep's laugh relaxed her enough to keep her focused on playing a nervous, distracted Emily. The highlight of the session was Streep's first line as Miranda. Instead of the "strident, bossy, barking voice" everyone expected, Hathaway says, Streep silenced the room by speaking in a near whisper. "It was so unexpected and brilliant." At the reading Streep also changed Miranda's last line to "everybody wants to be us" from the original "me".
Streep made a conscious decision not to play the part as a direct impression of Wintour, right down to not using an accent and making the character American rather than English ("I felt it was too restricting"). "I think she wanted people not to confuse the character of Miranda Priestly with Anna Wintour at all," said Frankel. "And that's why early on in the process she decided on a very different look for her and a different approach to the character." The "that's all," "please bore someone else ..."; her coat-tossing on Andrea's desk and discarded lunch are retained from the novel. Streep prepared by reading a book by Wintour protégé and the memoirs of Vogue editor . She lost so much weight during shooting that the clothes had to be taken in.
During the movie's press tour she also said her performance as Miranda was inspired by different men she knew, but did not say which ones. In 2016 she disclosed to Variety that she took Miranda's soft speaking style from : "He never, ever, ever raises his voice and everyone has to lean in to listen, and he is automatically the most powerful person in the room." However, she said, Eastwood does not make jokes, so instead she modeled that aspect of the character on theatrical and film director , whose delivery of a cutting remark, she said, made everyone laugh, including the target. "The walk, I'm afraid, is mine," Streep added.
For Miranda's actual look, Streep looked to two women. The hairstyle was inspired by model and actress , which Streep said she wanted to blend with "the unassailable elegance and authority of [French politician] ." The costumes Field designed for that look resulted in numerous blown during the where Miranda repeatedly throws her overcoat on Andrea's desk when she arrives in the morning. When McKenna saw Streep as Miranda for the first time on set, she recalls being so terrified she threw her arm in front of Frankel "like we were in a car wreck."
Hathaway prepared for the part by volunteering for a week as an assistant at an where she was "put through the wringer" according to Weisberger, who adds that Hathaway supplemented that by asking her many questions about working for Wintour. Frankel recalls that she was nervous through most of the shooting, particularly when working late, since , her boyfriend at that time, preferred strongly that she not do so; she was also having health issues due to a . The director said she was "terrified" before starting her first scene with Streep, who had begun her working relationship with Hathaway by saying first "I think you're perfect for the role and I'm so happy we're going to be working on this together" then warning her that was the last nice thing she would say.Streep applied this philosophy to everyone else on set as well, keeping her distance from the cast and crew members unless it was necessary to discuss something with them.
That scene, where Andi delivers the Book, the mockup of the magazine in progress, to Miranda's apartment, was, according to the Dengels, who played Miranda's twin daughters, totally . "That was just something we did with Anne and it made the cut," Colleen Dengel told in 2017. Nevertheless, it took three more days of filming to get the shot of the girls up in the stairwell the way Frankel wanted it, a look she believes was inspired by a similar scene with twin girls in .
Streep is the one who suggested the editorial meeting scene, which does not advance the plot but shows Miranda at work without Andrea present. It was also her idea that Miranda not wear makeup in the scene where she opens up to Andrea and worries about the effect on her daughters of her divorce becoming public knowledge. Blunt, for her part, contributed the line where she tells Andy "I'm hearing this", while opening and closing her hand, "and I want to hear this" keeping it closed. In 2015 she told that she had overheard a mother saying that to a child in a supermarket during production.
Frankel, who had worked with on his feature-film debut as well as , knew that what the cast wore would be of utmost importance in a movie set in the fashion industry. "My approach was to hire her and then leave the room," he joked later. While only appeared onscreen, many other designers were helpful to Field. Her 0,000 budget for the film's costumes was supplemented by help from friends throughout the industry. Ultimately, she believes, at least million worth of clothing was used in the film, making it one of the most expensively costumed movies in cinema history. The single priciest item was a 0,000 Fred Leighton on Streep.
When Hathaway enters the office after Nigel gives her access to Runway's closet, she is dressed entirely in . Field explained in 2016 that "I felt Annie Hathaway was a Chanel girl organically, as opposed to let's say a [or ] girl." When she called the company to ask for assistance, they were delighted because "they wanted to see Chanel on a young girl to give it another point of view," showing it as a brand for "not just middle-aged women in suits, but youthful and funky." rounds out Andrea's wardrobe.
and helped Field as well, with some contributions from Lebanese designer . Although Field avoids making Streep look like Wintour, she dresses her in generous helpings of (By Field's own estimate, 40% of the shoes on Streep's feet are Prada). "I know her character was originally based on Anna Wintour," Field said, "but I didn't want to copy someone's style." But, like Wintour and her Vogue predecessor , the two realized that Miranda needed a signature look, which was provided primarily by the white wig and she wore as well as the clothes the two spent much time poring over look-books for. "[I]n choosing her wardrobe my idea was that she's a chief fashion editor, she has her own style," Fields told in 2016. "We're creating an original character."
Field said she avoided prevailing fashion trends for Miranda during production in favor of a more timeless look based on archives and pieces by for . She did not want people to easily recognize what Miranda was wearing.in the outfit Field created for her character.
She contrasted Andrea and Emily by giving Andrea a sense of style, without much risk-taking, that would suggest clothing a fashion magazine would have on hand for shoots, clothing a recent college graduate with little sense of style would feel comfortable wearing in a fashion-conscious workplace. Blunt, on the other hand was "so on the edge she's almost falling off." For her, Field chose pieces by and to suggest a taste for funkier, more "underground" clothing. After the film's release, some of the looks Field chose became popular, to the filmmakers' amusement.
Tucci praised Field's skill in putting ensembles together that were not only stylish but helped him develop his character:
She just sort of sits there with her cigarette and her hair, and she would pull stuff — these very disparate elements — and put them together into this ensemble, and you'd go, "Come on, Pat, you can't wear that with that." She'd say, "Eh, just try it on." So you'd put it on, and not only did it work, but it works on so many different levels — and it allows you to figure out who the guy is. Those outfits achieve exactly what I was trying to achieve. There's flamboyance, there's real risk-taking, but when I walk into the room, it's not flashy. It's actually very subtle. You look at it and you go, "That shirt, that tie, that jacket, that vest? What?" But it works.
He found one tie he wore during the film to his liking and kept it.
After touring some offices of real fashion magazines, gave the Runway offices a clean, white look meant to suggest a makeup compact ("the chaste beiges and whites of impervious authority," called it). Miranda's office bears some strong similarities to the real office of Anna Wintour, down to an octagonal mirror on the wall, photographs and a floral arrangement on the desk Gonchor later told that he had based the set on a photo of Wintour's office he found online; the similarity led Wintour to have her office redecorated after the movie's release. The magazine itself is very similar to Vogue, and one of the covers on the wall of the office, showing three models, is a direct to the August 2004 cover of that magazine.
She even chose separate computer wallpaper to highlight different aspects of Blunt's and Hathaway's character: Paris's on Blunt's suggests her aspirations to accompany Miranda to the shows there, while the floral image on Andy's suggests the natural, unassuming qualities she displays at the outset of her tenure with the magazine. For the photo of Andrea with her parents, Hathaway posed with her own mother and . The Dengel twins recalled being asked every day for three years straight if the Harry Potter advance copies were real; to their great disappointment they were not and in fact were "all gibberish". They eventually auctioned them for 6 on , along with various clothing used in the film, to benefit Dress for Success, a charity which provides business clothing to help women transition into the workforce.
Aside from the clothing and accessories, some other well-known brands are conspicuous in the film.
- computers are used in the Runway offices, consistent with many real publishing companies.
- Bottles of Italian are seen in the Runway offices.
- IP telephones are used in the office of RUNWAY Magazine – including both reception desks outside the office of Miranda Priestly (played by Meryl Streep), Magazine Editor.
- Miranda drinks coffee from a nearby .
- Andrea uses a 2 (or a T-Mobile Sidekick 2) mobile phone, and Miranda a in silver, same as Nigel's.
- The two are frequently driven around in and S550 (without ) sedans.
- In one of the scenes is driving a .
- Andrea gives her friend a phone.
- The McGraw-Hill building on Sixth Avenue was used for the exteriors and of Elias-Clarke's headquarters.
- The Runway offices are partially corridors in the neighboring Fox building and partially sets.
- The Elias-Clarke is the one at the office in Manhattan.
- Nate and Andy's apartment is on the .
- Andy gets on the subway at the station and gets off at , both on the .
- Bubby's, the restaurant Nate works at (and where Andrea, Doug and Lily eat dinner on occasion) is in .
- The steakhouse and its kitchen were used.
- The Calvin Klein showroom is used in the deleted scenes.
- Holt's studio is a loft used by an actual designer.
- The was used for the exterior of the museum benefit, while the lobby of one of the courthouses is used for the interior.
- The Priestly is on the and belongs to a friend of Finerman's. It had to be dressed on short notice after another one could not be used.
- Christian gives Andy the unpublished Harry Potter manuscript at the 's King Cole Bar.
- The train the twins are taking is going up the at .
- Streep exits her , supposedly in Paris, at 77th Street and .
- The New York Mirror newsroom where Andrea gets hired at the end of the film is that of the now-defunct .
- The café where Andy apologizes to Nate was the Mayrose at 920 Broadway (near the ), which has since closed. On its site is a Flying Tiger Copenhagen store.
The crew were in Paris for only two days, and used only exteriors. Streep did not make the trip.
- The fountain Andy throws her phone into is on the .
- All the hotel interiors are actually the in Manhattan. The fashion shows were filmed on a in . Likewise, Christian's hotel is the Times Square .
realized, as McKenna had on the other end, that the film worked best when it focused on the Andrea-Miranda storyline. Accordingly, he cut a number of primarily transitional scenes, such as Andrea's job interview and the Runway staff's trip to Holt's studio. He also took out a scene early on where Miranda complimented Andrea. Upon reviewing them for the DVD, Frankel admitted he hadn't even seen them before, since Livolsi didn't include them in any prints he sent to the director.
Frankel praised Livolsi for making the film's four key —the opening credits, Miranda's coat-tossing, Andrea's makeover and the Paris introduction—work. The third was particularly challenging as it uses passing cars and other obstructions to cover Hathaway's changes of outfit. Some scenes were also created in the editing room, such as the reception at the museum, where Livolsi wove footage in to keep the action flowing.
Composer relied heavily on guitar and percussion, with the backing of a full , to capture a contemporary urban sound. He ultimately wrote 35 minutes of music for the film, which were performed and recorded by the Hollywood Studio Symphony, by Pete Anthony. His work was balanced with songs by ("", Miranda and Andrea in Paris), ("" & "", Andrea's fashion montage & her first day on the job, respectively), ("", female montage during ), ("", photo shoot), ("Our Remains," Andrea picks up James Holt's sketches for Miranda; Bittersweet Faith, Lily's art show), ("Sleep," following the breakdown of her relationship with Nate), ("Seven Days in Sunny June," Andrea and Christian meet at James Holt's party) among others. Frankel had wanted to use "City of Blinding Lights" in the film after he had used it as a soundtrack to a video montage of Paris scenes he had put together after scouting locations there. Likewise, Field had advocated just as strongly for "Vogue."
The soundtrack album was released on July 11 by . It includes all the songs mentioned above (except Madonna's "Jump") as well as a suite of Shapiro's themes. Among the tracks not included is "Suddenly I See," which disappointed many fans. It became popular as a result of the film.
Pre-release and marketing
Originally intended just to convince Fox to fund some shooting in Paris, Frankel's sizzle reel led the studio to put a stronger push behind the movie. It moved the release date from February to summer, scheduling it as a lighter alternative audiences could consider to at the end of June 2006, and began to position it as an event movie in and of itself.
Two decisions by the studio's marketing department that were meant to be preliminary wound up being integral to promoting the film. The first was the creation of the red ending in a as the film's teaser . It was so successful and effective, becoming almost "" (in Finerman's words), that it was used for the actual release poster as well. It became a brand, and was eventually used on every medium related to the film—the tie-in reprinting of the novel and the and DVD covers as well.
The studio also put together a of scenes and images strictly from the first three minutes of the film, in which Andrea meets Miranda for the first time, to be used at previews and until they could create a more standard trailer drawing from the whole film. But, again, this proved so effective with early audiences it was retained as the main trailer, since it created anticipation for the rest of the film without giving anything away.
Gabler credits the studio's marketing team for being "really creative". Fox saw the film as "counterprogramming" on the weekend was released. While they knew that the material and Hathaway would help draw a younger female audience that would not be as interested in seeing that film, "[w]e didn't want it to just seem like a coming out."
ReceptionThe stars of The Devil Wears Prada at the Venice premiere, front row: (left to right) , , Lisa Tucci and . can be seen behind and between Stanley and Lisa Tucci, and is partly visible to Stanley Tucci's left.
The Devil Wears Prada received positive reviews from critics. On the film has a rating of 75%, based on 191 reviews, with the site's critical consensus reads, "A rare film that surpasses the quality of its source novel, this Devil is a witty expose of New York's fashion scene, with Meryl Streep in top form and Anne Hathaway more than holding her own." On , the film has a score of 62 out of 100, based on 40 critics, indicating "generally favorable reviews".
Initial reviews of the film focused primarily on Streep's performance, praising her for making an extremely unsympathetic character far more complex than she had been in the novel. "With her silver hair and pale skin, her whispery diction as perfect as her posture, Ms. Streep's Miranda inspires both terror and a measure of awe," wrote in . "No longer simply the incarnation of evil, she is now a vision of aristocratic, purposeful and surprisingly human grace." agreed at the : "The snaky Streep wisely chooses not to imitate Vogue editrix Anna Wintour, the inspiration for the book, but creates her own surprisingly believable character."
, in magazine, criticized the film as "thin", but praised Streep for her "fabulous performance." J. Hoberman, Edelstein's onetime colleague at , called the movie an improvement on the book and said Streep was "the scariest, most nuanced, funniest movie villainess since 's [in ]."
Blunt, too, earned some favorable notice. "[She] has many of the movie's best lines and steals nearly every scene she's in," wrote Clifford Pugh in the . Other reviewers and fans concurred. While all critics were in agreement about Streep and Blunt, they pointed to other weaknesses, particularly in the story. Reviewers familiar with Weisberger's novel assented to her judgment that McKenna's script greatly improved upon it. An exception was Angela Baldassare at Canada, who felt the film needed more of the nastiness others had told her was abundant in the novel.
summed up this response in his review: "The Devil Wears Prada tells a familiar story, and it never goes much below the surface of what it has to tell. Still, what a surface!" Reactions to Hathaway's performance were not as unanimous as for many of her costars. Denby said "she suggests, with no more than a panicky sidelong glance, what Weisberger takes pages to describe." On the other hand, according to Baldassare, she "barely carrie[d] the load."
Depiction of fashion industry
Some media outlets allowed their present or former fashion reporters to weigh in on how realistic the movie was. Their responses varied widely. Booth Moore at chided Field for creating a "fine fashion fantasy with little to do with reality," a world that reflects what outsiders think fashion is like rather than what the industry actually is. Unlike the movie, in her experience fashionistas were less likely to wear makeup and more likely to value edgier dressing styles (that would not include ). "If they want a documentary, they can watch the ", retorted Field. Another newspaper fashion writer, Hadley Freeman of , likewise complained the film was awash in the and that, to her, beset movies about fashion in general.
Charla Krupp, the executive editor of SHOP, Inc., says "It's the first film I've seen that got it right ... [It] has the nuances of the politics and the tension better than any film—and the backstabbing and sucking-up." Joanna Coles, the editor of the U.S. edition of , agreed:
The film brilliantly skewers a particular kind of young woman who lives, breathes, thinks fashion above all else ... those young women who are prepared to die rather than go without the latest Muse bag from that costs three times their monthly salary. It's also accurate in its understanding of the relationship between the editor-in-chief and the assistant.
Ginia Bellefante, former fashion reporter for , called it "easily the truest portrayal of fashion culture since " and giving it credit for depicting the way fashion had changed in the early 21st century. Her colleague Ruth La Ferla found a different opinion from industry insiders after a special preview screening. Most found the fashion in the movie too safe and the beauty too overstated, more in tune with the 1980s than the 2000s. "My job is to present an entertainment, a world people can visit and take a little trip," responded Field.
, former editor of British , wrote in the that the movie was "a chilling reminder of the most surreal three years of my life." The only detail she found inaccurate was the absence of flowers in Miranda's Paris hotel room—during her tenure as editor, her rooms there or in received so many flowers from designers that she thought she "had died prematurely." She personally vouched for Miranda's personality: "It took only a few weeks in the job for me to mutate into that strangely exotic and spoilt creature: the magazine maven, whose every whim, like those of Miranda ... must be pandered to."
On its June 30 opening weekend, right before the holiday, the film was on 2,847 screens. Through that Sunday, July 2, it grossed million, second only to the much bigger-budget , breaking 's six-year-old record for the largest take by a movie released that holiday weekend that did not win the weekend; a record that stood until broke it in 2009.
During its first week it added million. This success led Fox to add 35 more screens the next weekend, the widest domestic distribution the film enjoyed. Although it was never any week's top-grossing film, it remained in the top 10 through July. Its theatrical run continued through December 10, shortly before the DVD release.
"The core marketing was definitely to women," Gabler recalls, "but the men didn't resist going to the movie." She felt that male viewers responded favorably to the movie because they sought a glimpse inside fashion, and because Miranda "was enjoyable to watch." The release date helped generate when people who had seen it discussed it at holiday gatherings. "They were talking about it, like a summer reading book," said Gabler.
It had a very successful run in theaters, making nearly 5 million in the United States and Canada and over 5 million worldwide, a career high for all three top-billed actresses at that time. Streep would surpass it two years later with while Hathaway exceeded it with 2010's . Blunt would not be in a higher-grossing film until of the Broadway musical (also starring Streep)., on whom Miranda is supposedly based, was at first skeptical of the film but later came to appreciate it.
It was also Tucci's highest-grossing film until in 2011.
attended the film's New York , wearing . Her friend reported that she said shortly afterward that the movie would go straight to DVD. But in an interview with that aired the day the DVD was released, she called the film "really entertaining" and said she appreciated the "decisive" nature of Streep's portrayal. "Anything that makes fashion entertaining and glamorous and interesting is wonderful for our industry. So I was 100 percent behind it."Streep said Wintour was "probably more upset by the book than the film". Wintour's popularity skyrocketed after her portrayal in The Devil Wears Prada. Streep said she did not base her character in The Devil Wears Prada on Anna Wintour, instead saying she was inspired by men she had known previously: "Unfortunately you don't have enough women in power, or at least I don't know them, to copy."
InternationalThe movie title in Spanish America (El diablo viste a la moda), English and Spanish (El diablo viste de Prada) in the same typeface as that used on the poster
Weisberger's novel had been translated into 37 different languages, giving the movie a strong potential foreign audience. The international box office would ultimately deliver 60% of the film's gross. "We did our European premiere at the ", Gabler says, where the city's wore red T-shirts with the film's logo. "So many people around the world were captivated by the glossy fashion world. It was sexy and international."
The Devil Wears Prada topped the charts on its first major European release weekend on October 9, after a strong September Oceania and Latin America opening. It would be the highest-grossing film that weekend in Britain, Spain and Russia, taking in .5 million overall. Continued strong weekends as it opened across the rest of Europe helped it remain atop the overseas charts for the rest of the month. By the end of the year only its Chinese opening remained; it was released there at the end of February 2007 and took in .4 million.
The greatest portion of the 1.8 million total international box office came from the United Kingdom, with .5 million. Germany was next with .1 million, followed by Italy at .3 million and France at .9 million. Outside Europe, Japanese box office was the highest at .6 million, followed by Australia at .6 million.
Most reviews from the international press echoed the domestic response, heaping praise on Streep and the other actors, but calling the whole film "predictable."'s , who found the film "moderately entertaining," took Blunt to task, calling her a "real disappointment ... strained and awkward." In , Anthony Quinn said Streep "may just have given us a classic here" and concluded that the film as a whole was "as snappy and juicy as fresh bubblegum."
In most markets the title remained unchanged; either the English was used or a translation into the local language. The only exceptions were Chile, Colombia, Ecuador, Mexico and Venezuela, where it was El diablo que viste Prada and El diablo se viste a la moda. In Poland, the title was Diabeł ubiera się u Prady which roughly means "The Devil dresses (itself) at Prada" rather than "The Devil Wears Prada." In Italian the title was ″Il diavolo veste Prada" which roughly means "The devil wears Prada". In Turkey, the title was "Şeytan Marka Giyer," roughly translated as "The Devil Wears Brand-Names." In Romania, the title was "Diavolul se îmbracă de la Prada," which roughly means "The Devil Dresses itself from Prada", the same construction being found in the French title, "Le Diable s'habille en Prada". The Japanese version is titled "プラダを着た悪魔", which translates as "The devil wearing Prada".
Awards and nominations
Three months after the film's North American release (October 2006), Frankel and Weisberger jointly accepted the first Blockbuster Book to Film Award. A committee of staffers at the magazine made the nominations and chose the award winner. Editor praised both works.
'The Devil Wears Prada' is an energetically directed, perfect-fit of a film that has surprised some in the industry with its box-office legs. It has delighted the country, much as did Lauren Weisberger's book, which is still going strong on several national bestseller lists.
The film was by the as one of the year's ten best. The gave the film .
The film received ample attention from the when its were announced in December. The film itself was in the running for Best Picture (Comedy/Musical) and Supporting Actress (for Blunt). Streep later won the Globe for Best Actress (Musical/Comedy).
In January 2007, Streep's fellow members of the her for Best Actress as well. Four days later, at the , Streep won Best Supporting Actress for her work both in Devil and . McKenna earned a nomination from the for Best Adapted Screenplay.
When the announced its , Blunt, Field, McKenna and Streep were all among the nominees. Makeup artist and Nicki Ledermann and Angel de Angelis also were nominated.
At the end of January, Streep received her 14th for , lengthening her record from 13 for most nominations by any actor male or female. Field received a nomination as well. Neither won, but Blunt and Hathaway presented the last mentioned award, amusing the audience by slipping into their characters for a few lines, nervously asking which of them had gotten Streep her . Streep played along with a stern expression before smiling.Award Date of ceremony Category Recipient(s) and nominee(s) Result Nominated Nominated Nominated Movie of the Year The Devil Wears Prada Won Top 10 Films The Devil Wears Prada Won December 2006 Best Comedy by or About Women Nominated Best Actress in a Comedic Performance Won Best Screenplay Written by a Woman Nominated Awards Circuit Community Awards December 2006 Best Actress in a Leading Role Nominated Best Actress in a Supporting Role Nominated May 16, 2007 BMI Film Music Won Nominated Nominated Nominated Nominated Nominated Nicki Ledermann
Angel De Angelis Nominated Central Ohio Film Critics Association Awards January 11, 2007 Best Actress Nominated Nominated Excellence in Costume Design for a Contemporary Film Nominated The Devil Wears Prada Nominated Nominated Nominated Nominated December 2006 Best Supporting Actress Nominated The Devil Wears Prada Nominated Won Nominated Golden Schmoes Awards December 2006 Best Supporting Actress of the Year Nominated Best Actress of the Decade Nominated Won Jupiter Awards March 2007 Best International Actress Nominated Nominated Won Won Nominated Nominated Nominated Best International Movie The Devil Wears Prada Nominated The Devil Wears Prada Won Won Nominated North Texas Film Critics Association Awards Best Actress Won Online Film & Television Association Awards February 10, 2007 Best Actress Nominated Best Costume Design Nominated Nominated Favorite Song from a Movie "" – Nominated Best International Actress Won The Devil Wears Prada Nominated Won Won Nominated Nominated Choice Summer Movie: Comedy The Devil Wears Prada Nominated Choice Movie: Chemistry
Nominated Choice Movie: Breakout Star – Female Nominated Nominated Best Screenplay
Nominated Nominated December 14, 2006 Best Comedic Performance Won Best Woman Storyteller Won Nominated
In other media
The success of the film led to a proposed, but unrealized, American series that was in contention to air for the 2007–08 television season on . It was to be produced by , with the premise adjusted for the confines of a traditional half-hour or one-hour with a set-up. However, it never reached the point of even producing a .
With the video release came renewed interest in Weisberger's novel. It ranked eighth on s list of 2006 and was the second most borrowed book in American libraries. The version was released in October 2006 and quickly made it to third on that medium's fiction best seller list.
In 2015, it was reported that had signed a deal two years earlier with Fox to develop some of the films from its back catalog into for the stage. Two he expressed particular interest in were and The Devil Wears Prada. Early in 2017, McCollum announced that in partnership with Fox Stage Productions, he was developing a musical version of The Devil Wears Prada (based on both the film and the book). will be composing the score for the project with playwright , who had written some early scenes for the screenplay, mostly with Miranda, writing the and lyrics. McCollum did not say when he expected it to premiere but hoped it would eventually play on Broadway.
Home media 
The DVD was released on December 12, 2006 and has, in addition to the film, the following extras:
- from Frankel, Mark Livolsi, Field, screenwriter Aline Brosh McKenna, producer Wendy Finerman and cinematographer .
- A five-minute featuring, among other shots, unintentional pratfalls by Hathaway due to the high she had to wear. It also includes gag shots such as a chubby crewmember in loose-fitting clothing walking along the at the fashion show, and Streep announcing "I have some nude photographs to show you" at the Paris brunch scene. Unlike most blooper reels, it is not a collection of sequential takes but rather a fast-paced montage set to music from the film with many backstage shots and a allowing the viewer to compare the actual shot with the blooper. The many shots of actors touching their noses are, says, a game played to assign blame for ruined takes.
- "Trip to the Big Screen", a 12-minute look at the film's , discussing the changes made from the novel, how Frankel was chosen to direct and other issues.
- "NYC and Fashion", a look at the real New York fashion scene and how it is portrayed in the film.
- "Fashion Visionary Patricia Field", a profile of the film's costume designer.
- "Getting Valentino", covering how the designer was persuaded to appear as himself in the film.
- "Boss from Hell", a short segment on difficult, nightmarish superiors like Priestly.
- Fifteen , with commentary from Frankel and Livolsi available (see below).
- The theatrical , and promotional spots for the soundtrack album and other releases.
in French and Spanish are also available. The DVD is available in both full screen and widescreen versions. Pictures of the cast and the "Hell on Heels" were added to the red-heel image for the cover. It was released in the UK on February 5, 2007.
A of the film was released simultaneously with the DVD. The Blu-ray maintains the same features as the DVD; however, the featurettes were dropped and replaced with a pop-up trivia track that can be watched by itself or along with the audio commentary.
Immediately upon its December 12 release, it became the top rental in the United States. It held that spot through the end of the year, adding another .5 million to the film's grosses; it dropped out of the top 50 at the end of March, with its grosses almost doubling. The following week it made its debut on the DVD sales charts in third position. By the end of 2007 it had sold nearly 5.6 million units, for a total of .4 million in sales.
Among the deleted scenes are some that added more background information to the story, with commentary available by the editor and director. Most were deleted by Livolsi in favor of keeping the plot focused on the conflict between Miranda and Andrea, often without consulting Frankel.
Frankel generally approved of his editor's choices, but differed on one scene, showing more of Andrea on her errand to the showroom. He felt that scene showed Andrea's job was about more than running personal errands for Miranda.
Cultural impact and legacy
In 2016, around the 10th anniversary of the film's release, did a rundown of some weekend movie box results from the previous 15 years, noting how some better-remembered films had been bested by films that have not stood the test of time. It called ' win over The Devil Wears Prada the "most ironic" of these victories. "[T]he degree to which [it]has penetrated pop culture needs no explanation–as does the degree to which Superman Returns didn't."
The cast's opinions on why the movie has endured differ. Hathaway told Variety that she thinks many people relate to Andy's predicament of working for someone who seems impossible to please. "Everybody has had an experience like this." Tucci did not believe specific explanations were necessary. "It's a fucking brilliant movie ... The brilliant movies become influential, no matter what they are about."
The cast members bonded tightly on the set, and remained close afterwards. Blunt invited them to her wedding to in 2010. There, Tucci met her sister Felicity, whom he later married. "Ten years after The Devil Wears Prada, Stanley is in my actual family," she told Variety. "How frightening is that?"
In its anniversary story, argued that it had benefited all three of its lead actresses. In addition to Streep's record-setting Oscar nomination, the magazine observed, it had proven that she could be a box-office draw by herself, opening doors up for her to be cast as a lead in later summer movies such as and . For Hathaway, it was her first leading role in a film intended for an adult audience. Subsequent producers were impressed that she had held her own playing opposite Streep, which led eventually to her being cast in more serious roles like and , for which she won an Oscar. "I think what people saw was promising—it made people want to see more."
Hathaway believes that Blunt's career took off because of her role. "I've never witnessed a star being born before," Hathaway says. "That's the first time I watched it happen." Blunt agrees that it was "a night and day change" for her—the day after the film was released, she told Variety, the staff at the coffee shop she had been going to for breakfast every morning in Los Angeles suddenly recognized her. Even ten years later, people still quote her lines from the film back to her at least once a week, she says.
"[The film] definitely paved the way for the filmmakers and distributors of the world to know that there was a female audience that was really strong out there", Gabler recalls, one that was not segmented by age. She pointed to later movies, such as Mamma Mia!, (written by McKenna) and , that appeared to her to be trying to replicate The Devil Wears Prada's success with that demographic. However, Gabler feels they did not do so as well. "Prada reminds me of movies that we don't have a lot of now—it harkens back to classic movies that had so much more than just one kind of plot line ... You just keep wanting to find something that can touch upon the same zeitgeist as this film."
For Streep, the most significant thing about the film was that "[t]his was the first time, on any movie I have ever made, where men came up to me and said, 'I know what you felt like, this is kind of like my life.' That was for me the most ground-breaking thing about Devil Wears Prada—it engaged men on a visceral level," she told .
Popular culture and society
The film has made a lasting impact on . Although a TV series based on it was not picked up, in the years after its release titled an episode "" and parodied some scenes. of began with as imitating Miranda after watching the film on .
In 2008, wrote that the movie had defined the image of a in the public mind. Seven years later, 's Francesca Mari wrote about "the assistant economy" by which many creative professionals rely on workers so titled to do menial personal and professional tasks for them; she pointed to The Devil Wears Prada as the best-known narrative of assistantship. The next year, writing about a proposed change in U.S. federal regulations that was seen as threatening to that practice, the Times called it the 'Devil Wears Prada' economy", a term other news outlets also used.
On the film's 10th anniversary, Alyssa Rosenberg wrote in that Miranda anticipated female of popular television series of the later 2000s and 2010s such as 's and in . Like them, she observes, Miranda competently assumes a position of authority often held by male characters, despite her moral failings, that she must defend against attempts to use her personal life to remove her from it, to "prov[e], as a creature of sentiment, that she never belonged there in the first place." In doing so, however successfully to herself and others, "she has zipped herself into a life as regimented and limited as a skintight ."
"Like many instant classics, Prada benefited from perfect timing", Variety's 2016 article observed, attempting to explain the film's enduring appeal. "It marked the beginning of the democratization of the fashion industry—when the masses started to pay attention to the business of what they wore." It credited the movie with helping stir interest in the American adaptation of the Colombian television series , which debuted months after its release.
The film also has been credited with increasing interest in 's , which followed and other editors as they prepared the issue for that month of 2007. Writing in on the tenth anniversary, Alison Herman observed that "The Devil Wears Prada transformed Wintour's image from that of a mere public figure into that of a cultural icon." Once known primarily as a fashion editor, she was now "every overlord you'd ever bitched about three drinks deep at , only to dutifully fetch her coffee the next day." Ultimately, the film had effected a positive change in Wintour's image, Herman argued, "from a tyrant in to an idol for the post- age."
In 2013, Weisberger wrote a sequel, Revenge Wears Prada. However, it does not seem likely that a film version of it, or any sequel, will be made, as two of the film's stars are not eager to do so. Streep has reportedly said that she is not interested in making a sequel for this film in particular. And while Hathaway admits she'd be interested in working with the same people, it would have to be "something totally different." The Devil Wears Prada, she told Variety "might have just hit the right note. It's good to leave it as it is."
In 2015, it was announced that a musical adaptation of the film was in the works. In 2017, it was announced that and were teaming up to write the show, with no timeline being set.
Films with similar plot elements
- , 2000 comedy about an overworked and mistreated low-level employee at a New York fashion magazine
- , 1994 film starring as a tyrannical movie producer and as his beleaguered assistant
- 's hair has also been cited as an inspiration
- To qualify that record slightly, Ice Age narrowly lost that opening weekend to , which unlike Superman Returns had opened the previous week.
The following year, also exceeded The Devil Wears Prada's July 4 opening weekend take without winning the weekend, as did in 2016, but neither film broke Ice Age's record.
- In 2008, outdid Devil's domestic box office but took in far less overseas.
- ^ . . Retrieved July 9, 2016.
- ^ (July 1, 2016). . . p. 2. Retrieved July 7, 2016.
- ^ French, Serena (June 21, 2006). . .
- ^ Walters, Barbara (December 12, 2006). . . Retrieved June 9, 2018.
- ^ Thompson, Anne (July 1, 2016). . . p. 3. Retrieved June 9, 2018.
- ^ Grove, Martin A. (June 28, 2006). . . Archived from on July 8, 2006. Retrieved July 13, 2016.
- ^ Setoodeh, Ramin (June 23, 2016). . . Retrieved July 3, 2016.
- ^ Thompson, Anne (July 1, 2016). . . p. 1. Retrieved June 9, 2018.
- Merin, Jennifer (December 13, 2006). . . Retrieved July 14, 2016 – via .
- Callaghan, Dylan (2006). . , West. Archived from on May 27, 2008. Retrieved July 13, 2016.
- ^ Finerman, Wendy (2006). "Trip to the Big Screen" on The Devil Wears Prada (DVD). USA: .
- ^ Miller, Julie (June 29, 2016). . . Retrieved July 7, 2016.
- (September 21, 2010). . . Archived from on September 4, 2013. Retrieved July 6, 2016.
- ^ Herman, Alison (June 30, 2016). . . Retrieved July 9, 2016.
- ^ Wickman, Kase (June 23, 2016). . . Retrieved July 7, 2016.
- ^ Krupnick, Ellie (January 24, 2014). . . Retrieved July 9, 2016.
- ^ (September 4, 2006). . . Retrieved July 16, 2016.
- ^ Young, Sage (June 30, 2016). . . Retrieved July 7, 2016.
- Whitty, Stephen; July 29, 2007; "Growing up in public"; , Section 4, page 2. "I wanted to illustrate how dangerous it was to not make your own choices ... I had been doing that for far too long"
- ^ Davies, Hugh (September 9, 2006). . . Archived from on November 7, 2007. Retrieved June 9, 2018.
- Tan, Michelle (August 27, 2007). . People.
- Celebrity Stink (July 11, 2006). . CinemaBlend. Retrieved June 9, 2018.
- . . Archived from on July 16, 2007. Retrieved June 9, 2018.
- ^ Blackmon, Michael (May 11, 2017). . . Retrieved May 11, 2017.
- Stanley Tucci on Graham Norton; ". Archived from on March 13, 2017. Retrieved August 22, 2017. "; retrieved March 9, 2017.
- ^ Lamphier, Jason. . . Archived from on October 12, 2007. Retrieved June 9, 2018.
- ^ . Fresh Intelligence. 2005-11-09. Archived from on 2006-05-06. Retrieved 2006-07-01.
- Field, Patricia. (2006). "Getting Valentino" on The Devil Wears Prada [DVD]. USA: 20th Century Fox.
- ^ (January 31, 2007). . . . Archived from on August 30, 2007. Retrieved April 30, 2017. I wanted the freedom to make this person up
- Hill, Amelia; October 8, 2006; ""; ; retrieved January 10, 2007.
- Miller, Judy (September 30, 2015). . . Retrieved July 4, 2016.
- Frankel, David (2006). "NYC and Fashion" on The Devil Wears Prada (DVD). USA: .
- ^ . . June 25, 2006. Retrieved June 9, 2018.
- Smith, C. Molly (June 30, 2016). . . Retrieved July 9, 2016.
- . . July 7, 2009. Retrieved February 27, 2010.
- (June 28, 2016). . . Interviewed by Elana Fishman. . Retrieved May 9, 2017.
- Nordstrom, Leigh (February 22, 2016). . . Retrieved July 7, 2016.
- Field, Patricia (2006). "NYC and Fashion" on The Devil Wears Prada (DVD). USA: .
- ^ Denby, David (July 3, 2006). . . Archived from on November 25, 2006. Retrieved June 10, 2018.
- November 25, 2006, at the .
- Lee, Helen (August 6, 2006). . Sassybella.com. Retrieved May 9, 2017.
- , retrieved from imdb.com December 24, 2006.
- . Archived from on November 18, 2009. ; retrieved from .com January 18, 2007.
- ^ Yandoli, Krystie Lee; Rackham, Casey (June 30, 2016). . . Retrieved July 3, 2016.
- Goldwasser, Dan (May 3, 2006). . Scoring-sessions.net. Retrieved June 9, 2018.
- Customer reviews, as of December 12, 2006; soundtrack; amazon.com; retrieved December 18, 2006.
- . . Amazon.com. Retrieved February 21, 2008.
- ^ Scott, A. O. (June 30, 2006). . . Retrieved June 9, 2018.
- Smith, Kyle (June 29, 2006). . . Retrieved June 9, 2018.
- Edelstein, David. . . Retrieved June 10, 2018.
- Hoberman, J.; June 27, 2006; ; ; retrieved June 30, 2006.
- Pugh, Clifford (June 30, 2006). . . Retrieved June 9, 2018.
- Elliot, Michael. . ChristianCritic. Archived from on November 26, 2006. Retrieved June 10, 2018.
- Slezak, Michael (August 11, 2006). . . Archived from on December 25, 2006. Retrieved June 10, 2018.
- ^ Baldassare, Angela. . Archived from on June 14, 2007.
- Moore, Booth (June 30, 2006). . . Retrieved June 10, 2018.
- ^ La Ferla, Ruth (June 29, 2006). . . Retrieved June 10, 2018.
- Freeman, Hadley (September 5, 2006). . . Retrieved June 10, 2018.
- Bellafante, Ginia (June 18, 2006). . The New York Times. Retrieved June 10, 2018.
- . . Retrieved July 12, 2016.
- . . Retrieved July 12, 2016.
- ^ . . Retrieved July 12, 2016.
- . . Retrieved July 12, 2016.
- . . Retrieved July 12, 2016.
- . . Retrieved July 5, 2016.
- Amiel, Barbara (July 2, 2006). . . Retrieved June 10, 2018.
- Brockes, Emma (September 23, 2006). . The Guardian. Retrieved June 10, 2018.
- Wigham, Helen (June 30, 2011). . . Retrieved November 5, 2017.
- Bresnan, Conor (October 9, 2006). . Box Office Mojo. Retrieved June 10, 2018.
- Bresnan, Conor (October 16, 2006). . Box Office Mojo. Retrieved January 8, 2007.
- Bresnan, Conor (October 23, 2006). . Box Office Mojo. Retrieved January 8, 2007.
- Bresnan, Conor (October 30, 2006). . Box Office Mojo. Retrieved January 8, 2007.
- ^ . Box Office Mojo. Retrieved July 12, 2016.
- French, Philip (October 8, 2006). . The Guardian. Retrieved June 10, 2018.
- Bradshaw, Peter (October 5, 2006). . The Guardian. Retrieved June 10, 2018.
- Quinn, Anthony (October 6, 2006). . . Archived from on November 8, 2006. Retrieved June 10, 2018.
- (Press release). New York, NY: The Quills Literacy Foundation. September 26, 2006. Archived from on December 17, 2007. Retrieved June 10, 2018.
- . . Retrieved June 10, 2018.
- . . Retrieved June 10, 2018.
- . . January 16, 2007. Archived from on May 14, 2007. Retrieved January 16, 2007.
- . . January 4, 2007. Archived from on September 7, 2008. Retrieved June 10, 2018.
- Kilday, Gregg (January 8, 2007). . . Archived from on September 30, 2007. Retrieved June 10, 2018.
- . . Archived from on January 8, 2011. Retrieved January 11, 2007.
- . . Retrieved June 10, 2018.
- . . Retrieved June 10, 2018.
- Dehnart, Andy (February 26, 2007). . . Archived from on October 8, 2007. Retrieved June 10, 2018.
- . "Variety". October 11, 2006. Retrieved July 13, 2016.
- Blais, Jacqueline (January 10, 2007). . . Retrieved July 13, 2016.
- "The Books Most Borrowed in U.S. Libraries". . 132 (1): 176. January 1, 2007.
- Maughan, S. (October 2, 2006). "Audio bestsellers/Fiction". . p. 19. , cited at Spiker.
- . Current Film. Archived from on February 12, 2007. Retrieved June 10, 2018.
- Blooper reel. (2006). The Devil Wears Prada [DVD]. USA: 20th Century Fox.
- Sommer, Rich (January 3, 2007). . . Archived from on January 18, 2008. Retrieved June 10, 2018.
- Bracke, Peter (December 11, 2006). . Highdef Digest. Retrieved June 10, 2018.
- . . Retrieved July 13, 2016.
- . . Retrieved July 13, 2016.
- Bradley, Laura (July 1, 2016). . . Retrieved July 12, 2016.
- Rozhon, Tracie (March 18, 2008). . . Retrieved July 6, 2016. The term 'personal assistant' has been degraded over the years and is now almost synonymous with the overworked, underpaid heroine of the movie and book The Devil Wears Prada.
- Mari, Francesca (Spring 2015). . . Retrieved July 13, 2015.
- Scheiber, Noam (May 30, 2016). . . Retrieved July 13, 2016.
- Timberg, Scott (May 31, 2016). . . Retrieved July 13, 2016.
- Rosenberg, Alyssa (June 30, 2016). . . Retrieved July 7, 2016.
(2003). . New York: Broadway Books. .