Although is responsible for the vast bulk of organic carbon on the surface of the Earth, its oxygenase activity can severely reduce photosynthetic efficiency. Some plants have evolved a way to minimize the oxygenase activity of Rubisco.
- Identify the conditions that increase oxygenase activity of Rubisco
- Describe how the oxygenase activity of Rubisco reduces photosynthetic efficiency
- Distinguish C3 and C4 schemes for carbon fixation
- Weigh the advantages and disadvantages of C3 versus C4
- Compare and contrast photosynthesis and respiration, and their relationship in the global carbon and oxygen cycles.
Rubisco’s oxygenase activity impairs photosynthetic efficiency
Rubisco has oxygenase activity as well as carboxylase activity; it sometimes fixes O2 to RuBP instead of CO2. The oxygenase activity occurs at low CO2, high O2 conditions, and becomes pronounced at high temperatures. As a result, organic carbon is oxidized, the opposite of photosynthesis, which reduces inorganic carbon to make organic carbon.
For the curious: oxygenase activity of Rubisco, from Wikipedia. RuBP (1) interconverts to an enol isomer (2) that combines with oxygen to form the unstable intermediate (3) that hydrolyzes into phosphoglycolate (4) and 3PG (5)
The oxygenation of RuBP produces 2-phosphoglycolate, a 2-carbon toxic compound which undergoes a series of reactions in the peroxisome and mitochondria, releasing CO2 and resulting in loss of organic carbon and energy production. This process is called – an awfully misleading name for students, because it has nothing to do with respiration and yields no ATP. All Biol 1510 students need to remember about photorespiration is that it reduces photosynthetic efficiency, and that it occurs when Rubisco oxygenates RuBP instead of carboxylating RuBP.
Rubisco evolved even before oxygenic photosynthesis, when there was no oxygen in the atmosphere or in the ocean waters, so there was no selection against oxygenase activity. Nevertheless, in over 2 billion years, neither nature nor human genetic engineering has been able to eliminate or even significantly reduce the oxygenase activity of Rubisco without also affecting the carboxylase activity.
C4 plants have evolved a mechanism to deliver CO2 to Rubisco
In order for plants to take in CO2, they have to open structures called stomata on their leaves, which are pores that allow gas exchange. Plants also lose water vapor through their stomata, which means that they can die from dehydration in dry conditions as they keep their stomata open for photosynthesis. In response, plants close their stomata to prevent dehydration. The immediate consequences of closed stomata in the short term are reduced CO2 concentration (CO2 levels decrease as it is utilized for photosynthesis) and increased O2 concentration (O2 levels increase as it is produced by photosynthesis). The rising O2 levels increase the rate of photorespiration (reaction of rubisco with oxygen instead of carbon dioxide), when then drastically reduces the efficiency of rubisco, which is already a very slow-working enzyme. So this means plants in dry conditions are at risk of dehydration if they open their stomata to promote gas exchange, or inability to produce sugar if they keep their stomata closed to minimize dehydration. (the long-term consequence of permanently-closed stomata is death by suffocation as the mitochondria run out of oxygen to carry out respiration.)
Many plants which live in hot and/or dry conditions have evolved an alternative carbon fixation pathway to enhance the efficiency of rubisco so that they don’t have to keep their stomata open as much, and thus they reduce the risk of dying from dehydration. These plants are called C4 plants, because the first product of carbon fixation is a 4-carbon compound (instead of a 3-carbon compound as in C3 or “normal” plants). C4 plants use this 4-carbon compound to effectively “concentrate” CO2 around rubisco, so that rubisco is less likely re react with O2.
There are two important adaptations that allow C4 plants to do this:
- First, C4 plants use an alternate enzyme for the first step of carbon fixation. This enzyme is called phosphoenolpyruvate (PEP) carboxylase, and it has no oxygenase activity and has a much higher affinity for CO2 than rubisco. As the name “PEP carboxylase” suggests, the enzyme attaches CO2 to a compound called phosphoenolpyruvate (PEP).
- Second, C4 plants have specialized leaf anatomy with two different types of photosynthetic cells: mesophyll cells (on the exterior of the leaf, near stomata) and bundle sheath cells (in the interior of the leaf, far away from stomata). Rubisco is located in bundle sheath cells, but not in mesophyll cells.
Here’s how all this works:
PEP carboxylase is located in the mesophyll cells, on the leaf exterior near the stomata. There is no rubisco in the mesophyll cells. CO2 entering the stomata is rapidly fixed by PEP carboxylase into a 4-carbon compound, called malate, by attaching the CO2 to PEP. The malate is then transported deeper into the leaf tissue to the bundle sheath cells, which are both far away from the stomata (and thus far away from oxygen) and contain rubisco. Once inside the bundle sheath cells, malate is decarboxylated to release pyruvate and CO2; the CO2 is then fixed by rubisco as part of the Calvin cycle, just like in C3 plants. Pyruvate then returns to the mesophyll cells, where a phosphate from ATP is used to regenerate PEP. Thus in C4 plants, C4 carbon fixation has a net added cost of 1 ATP for every CO2 delivered to rubisco; however, C4 plants are less likely to die of dehydration compared to C3 plants in dry conditions.
The image below illustrates the pathway we just described:
C4 carbon fixation overview, from Wikimedia
What Biol 1510 students need to remember about C4 is that these plants have added a CO2 concentration mechanism to feed rubisco and the Calvin cycle; the mechanism uses PEP carboxylase to initially make a 4-carbon compound, that then releases CO2 to rubisco in leaf cells that are exposed to little oxygen. While this mechanism reduces the oxygenase activity of rubisco, it has an extra energy cost in the form of another ATP per mole CO2 fixed.
The (cropped) video below provides a great overview comparison of C3 vs C4 photosynthesis, but be aware of the following issues with this video: the video makes it sound as though RuBP catalyzes its own reaction with CO2 to form to 2 molecules of 3-carbon 3PG, instead of being one of the reactants in this reaction. This enzymatic reaction is catalyzed by rubisco, and it is rubisco that has oxygnase activity, not RuBP! The video also makes it sounds like PEP catalyzes its own reaction with CO2 to form 4-carbon malate, when in reality this reaction is catalyzed by PEP carboxylase.
The full video is here for your reference:
If you want to know more, the video below gives a more thorough (albeit somewhat slow) illustration of this process:
Advantages and disadvantages of C4 and C3 carbon fixation
- C4 plants grow better than C3 plants under hot, dry conditions when plants must close their stomata to conserve water – with stomata closed, CO2 levels in the interior of the leaf fall, and O2 levels rise.
- C3 plants grow better than C4 plants under cool, moist conditions when plants can open their stomata, because C3 plants do not incur the additional cost of ATP of C4 carbon fixation.
Photosynthesis and Respiration: mirror images?
The chemical equations for oxygenic photosynthesis and aerobic respiration are exactly the reverse of each other.
A balance between the global rates of photosynthesis (primary production) and global rates of respiration is needed to maintain stable atmospheric concentrations of CO2 and O2.
In eukaryotes, both photosynthesis and respiration occur in organelles with double membranes and their own circular genomes, that originated as prokaryotic endosymbionts.
Both processes have electron transport chains, chemiosmosis and ATP synthase powered by proton motive force.
The powerpoint slides used in the video screencasts are in the slide set.